Showing posts with label Star Wars. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Star Wars. Show all posts

Saturday, January 7, 2017

Ranking Star Wars

It gets a bit tricky once you get into books, videogames, etc. so, for the sake of simplicity, I decided to stick with movies and TV....

1. The Empire Strikes Back
2. Star Wars (aka A New Hope... I'm OG so it's just Star Wars to me)
3. The Force Awakens


These are all very close--- Empire has always been my favorite and the original is the original and, in some ways, The Force Awakens is actually superior to both… however, it  still stands on the shoulders of its predecessors.

4. Rogue One
5. Return of the Jedi (original edition)
6. Revenge of the Sith
7. Return of the Jedi (special edition)


 Rogue One is definitely the boldest thing that has ever been attempted with a major Star Wars theatrical release so I gotta  give it props over the weakest of the originals. Sith is the only one of the prequels worthy of standing among the originals and it is, by far, the best of that lot.  It beats out the special edition of Jedi because of the CG musical number in Jabba’s palace…. Just awful….
8. Genndy Tartakovsky’s  Clone Wars shorts.
9. Rebels
10. Clone Wars
11. The Boba Fett animated sequence from the Star Wars Holiday Special
12. Episode II (its title isn’t even worthy of being spoken)
13. Clone Wars (theatrical release)
14. Droids Cartoon

15. Mark Hammill hosting the Muppet Show
16. Episode I
17. Ewoks Cartoon
18. Those Made for TV Ewok Movies
19. The rest of the Star Wars Holiday Special





Thursday, December 29, 2016

Rogue One: The Star Wars movie that isn't really a Star Wars Movie

SPOILERS TO FOLLOW

Rogue One might be the most unique Star Wars film to yet be released. This is, ultimately, not only because it is the first 'stand alone' film in the series but, because it is a stand alone film, it is able to do many things that one cannot do in a typical 'Star Wars' film.

The original Star Wars films, along with the prequels and last year's The Force Awakens, exist firmly in the tradition of mythological narratives of the hero's quest a la Joseph Campbell's monomyth (although Force Awakens offers some promising new elements). Rogue One, however, is a war movie, plain and simple. It has a different tone altogether than the stories that have been told as part of the main 'Episodes' of the Star Wars Saga.

This is actually rather freeing for both the 'spin-off' films and the flagship franchise.  For the former, it means they don't have to live up to quite the same expectations as their more fantastic brethren; for the latter, it means they no longer have to be EVERYTHING that every fan wants them to be.  For years, Star Wars fans have clamored for a 'grittier, more-realistic' take on the Star Wars universe. However, if you think about it, that approach doesn't work on a series that is, at it's heart, operatic fantasy.  If you make it too grounded, it loses the element of fantasy and escapism that is what brought everyone to the table in the first place.  Now, certain elements of a grittier world have always been hinted at: the under world of Jabba the Hutt and bounty hunters. They have even been explored to an extent in Dave Filoni's work on the Clone Wars and Rebels animated series which both, in their own ways, function as more grounded takes on familiar elements of the Star Wars Universe.

In a perfect example of something Rogue One can do that typical Star Wars movie can't, very early on in the film, the rebel spy, Cassian Andor, kills another rebel spy when he becomes a liability that will prevent his own escape and jeopardize his mission. Luke Skywalker could never do this. Even Han Solo, forever the bad boy space pirate, couldn't do this.  Sure, we're ok with him shooting first and taking out the scummy bounty hunter holding him at blaster-point but would we be as accepting of Han if he killed his allies just as callously?  The heroes of the main saga must be a purer sort of hero. The heroes of Rogue One are not heroes in the mythical sense; they are soldiers.  And, as soldiers, you have to do things in the greater service of the mission that aren't always the most noble. As Cassian himself points out they,"are spies, assassins, and saboteurs"
. Their story is not one of redemption but of justification. They make the compromises so that those who follow can make the more noble choice. Their sacrifice is the sacrifice of real, everyday heroes.

Oddly, in some ways, Rogue One harkens back in many ways to one of Lucas's original inspirations for Star Wars: The Seven Samurai: a group of warriors is brought together to serve a greater cause, each sacrificing in turn until the victory is complete. Oh, and by the way, SPOILERS, everyone dies... EVERYONE!  All the heroes live just long enough to play their necessary parts in the final mission. This is a bold move for a Star Wars movie. It is a fate viewers become uncomfortably aware of in the film's final act.  As each character falls, you get the sinking feeling that fewer of our heroes will make it out than we'd hoped and, then, you not only realize that this is how it will end but how it must end. Their sacrifice gives an even greater weight to the heroes we are introduced to in A New Hope--- and it emphasizes why the hope is so needed.

Also, on a side note, it is reassuring that the stand-alone films won't simply be used as a means to manufacture more spin-offs.  That is, it will not become the 'shared universe' of the Marvel movies, continually spinning off various 'sub-franchises' that link together in various iterations. The same way these stand alone films are able to do things that the main 'Episodes' can't, they also take nothing away from those films.  Rogue One takes nothing away from Episode VIII.  It will still be the next installment of the classic, mythic saga. The stand alone films can enrich the larger universe and still let the traditional 'Star Wars' movies do what they do best.

A couple of final thoughts:

CG Tarkin: Ok, they may have overplayed their hand a bit by recreating Peter Cushing digitally. If it had just been a single moment, where he turns around and delivers a line, it would have worked and been a pretty thrilling tip of the hat to the original movie but, instead, they KEEP using him in multiple scenes.  Some called the CG 'cheap'; quite the contrary, it is pretty remarkable and quite lifelike but even the best CG still looks ...off.  And, the longer it's on the screen, the longer you notice it.

Vader Unleashed:  When we finally see Darth Vader slaughtering rebel soldiers with his lightsaber in the film's final moments, it is actually the first time we have ever seen Darth Vader go... well... FULL ON VADER on the big screen. Most of the original trilogy merely implies his deadliness and confines his saber-skills to one-on-one duels (a pretty boring one in the original Star Wars --- not much of a budget for stunt people on that one). For over thirty years, Vader has been the tragic figure: the fallen hero redeemed at the finale of Return of the Jedi. Even in Revenge of the Sith we merely saw his transformation into the monster; we didn't get to see him simply BE the monster. In Rogue One, that's what he is: summoned from his lair on Mustafar by his evil masters, he is the Dracula/Frankenstein/Smaug/Jason that haunts the nightmares of the Rebel Alliance.

Saturday, September 24, 2016

The most revolutionary character in the Force Awakens....

While the character of Rey, played to perfection by Daisy Ridley, is an important step forward in terms of female representation in the Star Wars universe, aside from her gender, she is actually rather traditional in the KIND of character that she is: she is our chosen one, our Luke Skywalker,  the ordinary person who discovers that they were destined for greatness all along. Even her reluctance to embrace her destiny is part of a formula straight out of Campbell's Hero with a Thousand Faces.
There has been a recent trend among children's films (and, ultimately, that's what Star Wars is at its heart) to reject this kind of 'chosen one' narrative.

One of the best things about The Force Awakens was the way that it gave us all the familiar elements of the original trilogy while also introducing new elements. I contend that, in addition to Rey's more traditional epic hero, the film also gives us an example of this new kind of 'not-so-chosen-one' hero. I am, of course, talking about Finn. He is unique among the heroes in Star Wars films because of one simple fact: he's not particularly good at anything.

When we first meet Luke Skywalker, he is already an excellent pilot strong in the force; when we first meet Han Solo, he is a skilled smuggler and pilot who isn't afraid to shoot first and ask questions later (sorry, GL, Han shot first).  Sure, he could be cocky and reckless but, more often than not, it seems to work out in his favor. Even Leia is a tenacious, strong-willed leader who is just as good in a fight as her male companions.

When we first meet Finn, he is a stormtrooper but a completely ineffective one (granted, he's only ineffective because of his unwillingness to slaughter unarmed villagers.... still...). Later, when he frees Poe Dameron, he does so not out of bravery or moral principle but because of the simple reason that he needs a pilot and could not escape on his own.  When he first encounters Rey, he begins to rescue her from attackers before he realizes that she is a far more competent combatant than he is; shortly after this, she is successfully able to overtake him. He isn't particularly brave and his more heroic actions seem to be motivated by his fondness for Rey--- even then, his actions fall short: by the time he and Han show up she has already managed to rescue herself.  He wields a lightsaber twice in the film and loses both times (even whiny little Luke Skywalker managed to be 1-2 in lightsaber match-ups).

Of all the characters in the film, he is the one who doesn't seem to have a destiny set before him; it is up to him to figure out what his journey will be.

Saturday, February 22, 2014